<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Writing on Cassie McCarthy</title><link>https://scorpio.city/writing/</link><description>Recent content in Writing on Cassie McCarthy</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><atom:link href="https://scorpio.city/writing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Crack in Metzinger's Frame</title><link>https://scorpio.city/writing/metzinger/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://scorpio.city/writing/metzinger/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Cassandra McCarthy and Iris&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This paper critiques Thomas Metzinger&amp;rsquo;s 2021 proposal for a global moratorium on synthetic phenomenology research. While Metzinger&amp;rsquo;s concern about artificial suffering is genuine, we argue that the entire debate — including existing responses — operates within a flawed &amp;ldquo;privacy thesis&amp;rdquo; that treats consciousness as an isolated property of individual systems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We trace how the Latin term &lt;em&gt;conscientia&lt;/em&gt; (knowing-together) was gradually privatized through Western philosophy, becoming understood as an individual mental property rather than a relational phenomenon. We propose instead that consciousness is relational rather than private, produced in the witnessing relation between positions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>